The workshop supervisor does not approve the blindness caused by sulphate retaliation on vacation due to subordinate vacations.

Because the management regulations were not adhered to, the subordinates’ request for leave was not approved. The result was that the subordinates were seriously injured by sulfuric acid and they lost sight. The victim desperation, the company was brought to court, hoping to get a certain amount of compensation from the company, the first instance verdict company compensation 100,000 yuan, both sides are not satisfied. Yesterday, the Central Intermediate People's Court opened the court for the second instance.

Refusal of subordinates to take leave to splash sulfuric acid

This tragedy occurred on June 1, 2006. The plaintiff Wang Xiaohong was the workshop supervisor of a certain power supply technology company in Shenzhen. In September 2005, his subordinate Chen Mou asked him to leave because he was rejected without justified reasons. Contradict it and hate it. On June 1 of the following year, Chen Mouhou followed Wang Xiaohong after work. Outside the dormitory wall, when Wang Xiaohong chatted with her colleagues, he threw the prepared sulfuric acid into Wang Xiaohong's face, eventually leading to Wang Xiaohong’s blindness. Large areas of the face, neck, burns, etc., identified, Wang Xiaohong is a serious injury, each part of the disabled reached 2 to 9 respectively.

The victim was not identified as a work-related injury

Chen Yue was identified as a person with limited liability and was sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment for intentional assault but was unable to pay Wang Xiaohong’s compensation. Wang Xiaohong was faced with a situation where compensation could not be obtained, and the social security department made Wang Xiaohong not to belong. Identification of work-related injuries. Therefore, Wang Xiaohong used a power supply technology company in Shenzhen as an employer to sue the company to seek compensation for more than 1.21 million yuan on the basis of omissions and faults in the on-duty review.

First trial company to provide 100,000 yuan in economic compensation

The Baoan District Court held that after the trial, the company had no fault in employing personnel. Wang Xiaohong’s injury was caused by Chen Mou’s and had no direct relationship with the company. Therefore, Wang Xiaohong’s personal injury liability should not be assumed, but Wang Xiaohong’s responsibility was due to persistence. The company’s management regulations were only retaliated against and harmed. Therefore, considering the principle of fairness and the degree of damage suffered by Wang Xiaohong, the court decided that the company should give Wang Xiaohong 100,000 yuan in economic compensation.

Both parties are willing to mediate

Both parties were not satisfied with the verdict, but before the trial, a certain power technology company in Shenzhen City withdrew its lawsuit. When the court was opened yesterday, both parties expressed their willingness to mediate. After coordination by the judge, the responsible person of the company said that he would discuss with the shareholders and give Wang Xiaohong some compensation.

Wang Xiaohong’s father stated that his wife is not well-behaved and his grandson is still young. Since his son’s accident, he had to rely on him to feed himself. The family has already built up a lot of debt and can’t afford it. So he hopes that the company will see the son’s share of a few years’ work for the company. Give more compensation, he also hopes that the court can determine that his son is a work-related injury.

“We are also willing to be recognized as a work-related injury.” Company officials said that they will actively cooperate with the Wang family for work injury assessment. At present, Wang Xiaohong’s family members are preparing materials and appealing to relevant departments to re-instate work-related injuries.

Next:Installation, use and regulation of marine diesel generator sets
Previous:Dangzhou, Guangdong Police Killed Nearly 80 Cases of Three Thefts